Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Health

Reposted from Citizens for Free Speech

Posted by Patrick Wood 919sc on May 11, 2020 

With the advent of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a number of medical practices that have little or no scientific support as regards reducing the spread of this infection. One of these measures is the wearing of facial masks, either a surgical-type mask, bandana or N95 respirator mask.

When this pandemic began and we knew little about the virus itself or its epidemiologic behavior, it was assumed that it would behave, in terms of spread among communities, like other respiratory viruses. Little has presented itself after intense study of this virus and its behavior to change this perception.

This is somewhat of an unusual virus in that for the vast majority of people infected by the virus, one experiences either no illness (asymptomatic) or very little sickness. Only a very small number of people are at risk of a potentially serious outcome from the infection—mainly those with underlying serious medical conditions in conjunction with advanced age and frailty, those with immune compromising conditions and nursing home patients near the end of their lives. There is growing evidence that the treatment protocol issued to treating doctors by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mainly intubation and use of a ventilator (respirator), may have contributed significantly to the high death rate in these select individuals.

By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.

Russell Blaylock, MD

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”¹   Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.

It is also instructive to know that until recently, the CDC did not recommend wearing a face mask or covering of any kind, unless a person was known to be infected, that is, until recently. Non-infected people need not wear a mask. When a person has TB we have them wear a mask, not the entire community of non-infected. The recommendations by the CDC and the WHO are not based on any studies of this virus and have never been used to contain any other virus pandemic or epidemic in history.

Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.

There is a difference between the N95 respirator mask and the surgical mask (cloth or paper mask) in terms of side effects. The N95 mask, which filters out 95% of particles with a median diameter >0.3 µm² , because it impairs respiratory exchange (breathing) to a greater degree than a soft mask, and is more often associated with headaches. In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 healthcare workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches.²

They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.

A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask.³   Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All felt like the headaches affected their work performance.

Unfortunately, no one is telling the frail elderly and those with lung diseases, such as COPD, emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, of these dangers when wearing a facial mask of any kind—which can cause a severe worsening of lung function. This also includes lung cancer patients and people having had lung surgery, especially with partial resection or even the removal of a whole lung.
While most agree that the N95 mask can cause significant hypoxia and hypercapnia, another study of surgical masks found significant reductions in blood oxygen as well. In this study, researchers examined the blood oxygen levels in 53 surgeons using an oximeter. They measured blood oxygenation before surgery as well as at the end of surgeries.⁴ The researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels (pa0²) significantly. The longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels.

The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. . This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.^5,6,7

People with cancer, especially if the cancer has spread, will be at a further risk from prolonged hypoxia as the cancer grows best in a microenvironment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes inflammation which can promote the growth, invasion and spread of cancers.^8,9  Repeated episodes of hypoxia has been proposed as a significant factor in atherosclerosis and hence increases all cardiovascular (heart attacks) and cerebrovascular (strokes) diseases.¹⁰

There is another danger to wearing these masks on a daily basis, especially if worn for several hours. When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. If they are wearing a mask, especially an N95 mask or other tightly fitting mask, they will be constantly rebreathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. We know that people who have the worst reactions to the coronavirus have the highest concentrations of the virus early on. And this leads to the deadly cytokine storm in a selected number.

It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain.^11,12 In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.¹³

It is evident from this review that there is insufficient evidence that wearing a mask of any kind can have a significant impact in preventing the spread of this virus. The fact that this virus is a relatively benign infection for the vast majority of the population and that most of the at-risk group also survive, from an infectious disease and epidemiological standpoint, by letting the virus spread through the healthier population we will reach a herd immunity level rather quickly that will end this pandemic quickly and prevent a return next winter. During this time, we need to protect the at-risk population by avoiding close contact, boosting their immunity with compounds that boost cellular immunity and in general, care for them.

One should not attack and insult those who have chosen not to wear a mask, as these studies suggest that is the wise choice to make.
References

1. bin-Reza F et al. The use of mask and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: A systematic review of the scientific evidence. Resp Viruses 2012;6(4):257-67.
2. Zhu JH et al. Effects of long-duration wearing of N95 respirator and surgical facemask: a pilot study. J Lung Pulm Resp Res 2014:4:97-100.
3. Ong JJY et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment- A cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache 2020;60(5):864-877.
4. Bader A et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia 2008;19:12-126.
5. Shehade H et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 negatively regulates Th1 function. J Immunol 2015;195:1372-1376.
6. Westendorf AM et al. Hypoxia enhances immunosuppression by inhibiting CD4+ effector T cell function and promoting Treg activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;41:1271-84.
7. Sceneay J et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression contributes to the pre-metastatic niche. Oncoimmunology 2013;2:1 e22355.
8. Blaylock RL. Immunoexcitatory mechanisms in glioma proliferation, invasion and occasional metastasis. Surg Neurol Inter 2013;4:15.
9. Aggarwal BB. Nucler factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203-208.
10. Savransky V et al. Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces atherosclerosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007;175:1290-1297.
11. Baig AM et al. Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: Tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. ACS Chem Neurosci 2020;11:7:995-998.
12. Wu Y et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behavior, and Immunity, In press.
13. Perlman S et al. Spread of a neurotropic murine coronavirus into the CNS via the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Virology 1989;170:556-560.

---

Dr. Russell Blaylock, author of The Blaylock Wellness Report newsletter, is a nationally recognized board-certified neurosurgeon, health practitioner, author, and lecturer. He attended the Louisiana State University School of Medicine and completed his internship and neurological residency at the Medical University of South Carolina. For 26 years, practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently retired from his neurosurgical duties to devote his full attention to nutritional research. Dr. Blaylock has authored four books, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life, Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients, and his most recent work, Cellular and Molecular Biology of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

“Globalism is the new path of communism. The emergency will last forever ”

*** exclusive content of Diário do Brasil Patrícia Moraes Carvalho | 5/17/2020 | 9:13 AM | DB HIGHLIGHTS (Google translation)

The Comunavirus has arrived

(Ernesto Henrique Fraga Araújo - diplomat, Brazilian writer and current Minister of Foreign Affairs of Brazil - reproduction)

The Coronavirus makes us wake up again to the communist nightmare.

This is shown by Slavoj Žižek, one of the main Marxist theorists of today, in his booklet “Virus”, recently published in Italy (*).

Žižek reveals what Marxists have hidden for thirty years:

    Globalism replaces socialism as a preparatory stage for communism.

The coronavirus pandemic represents, for him, an immense opportunity to build a world order without nations and without freedom.

I quote and comment below on excerpts from the booklet of Žižek, that masterpiece of naïveté canalha, which undisguisedly delivers the communist-globalist game of appropriation of the pandemic to completely subvert liberal democracy and the market economy, enslave the being and transform it into an automaton devoid of a spiritual dimension, easily controllable:

“Hopefully, a different and much more beneficial ideological virus will spread, and we only have to hope that it will infect us: a virus that makes us imagine an alternative society, a society that goes beyond the nation-state and is realized in the form of solidarity and cooperation. ”

“One thing is certain: new walls and other quarantines will not solve the problem. What works are solidarity and a coordinated response on a global scale, a new form of what was once called communism. ”

Žižek does not hide his longing and his belief that a virus “different and more beneficial” than the coronavirus, the ideological virus, will infect the world and allow communism to be built in an unexpected way.

He is not even interested in what works or does not work to fight the coronavirus, quarantine or the closing of borders, because the goal is not to quell the disease, but to use it as a ladder to go down to hell, whose doors seemed blocked since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but it finally reopened.

All in the name of “solidarity”, of course, just as in Orwell's 1984 universe, systematic oppression is in charge of the “Ministry of Love”.

Whoever wants to defend their basic freedoms, whoever wants to continue living in a nation-state, will be lacking the basic duty of "solidarity".

"A first and vague model of such coordination on a global scale is represented by the World Health Organization (WHO) (...) Greater powers will be conferred on other organizations of this type."

It does not escape Žižek, of course, the value that the WHO has at the moment for the cause of denationalization, one of the assumptions of communism.

Transferring national powers to WHO, under the pretext (never proven!) That a centralized international body is more efficient in dealing with problems than countries acting individually, is only the first step in building planetary communist solidarity.

Following the same model, power must also be transferred to other organizations, each in its own domain.

Žižek does not specify it, but he probably has in mind a global industrial policy being dictated by UNIDO, a global educational program controlled by UNESCO and so on.

“Doesn't all this clearly show the urgent need for a reorganization of the global economy that is no longer subject to market mechanisms? And here we are not talking about former communism, of course, but about some kind of global organization that can control and regulate the economy, as well as that can limit the sovereignty of national states when necessary. ”
Yes, it is not the communism of yore, which installed in one country now, in another, a system of central economic planning, always failed to provide well-being, always successful in controlling and oppressing society.

    It is now a worldwide central planning, which would certainly bring the same failure and the same success of this model when applied in the past on a national scale.

"Many moderate and left-wing progressive commentators have revealed how the coronavirus epidemic lends itself to justifying and legitimizing the imposition of control and discipline measures on people hitherto inconceivable within the framework of Western democratic societies."

Žižek mentions among these commentators Giorgio Agamben, an apparently non-Marxist left-wing philosopher, who wrote with great apprehension about the curbing of freedoms that is underway and who considered the reaction to the pandemic to be a highly exaggerated panic (**). But what these commentators see with concern, Žižek welcomes, and inti

Žižek welcomes, and titles the chapter in which he deals with this topic precisely:

“Watch and punish? Yes please!"

Žižek, of course, refers to the title of Michel Foucault's 1975 book, Surveiller et Punir in the original, which described the evolution from 19th century prisons to the barless prisons of Western postmodern control society.

“It is not surprising that, at least until now, China - which already used digitalized social control systems widely - has proved to be the best equipped to face the catastrophic epidemic. Should we perhaps deduce from this that, at least in some respects, China represents our future? Aren't we approaching a global state of exception? ”

“But if that [the Chinese model] is not the communism I have in mind, what do I mean by communism? To understand it, just read the WHO statements. ”

Žižek has an ambiguous attitude towards China. He admires what he considers the Chinese success in social control, but at the same time he doesn't seem to want to identify his own conception of communism with the Chinese regime, perhaps because communism, after all, demands the end of the state, while China represents the strong state model that communism aims to overcome.

This non-State, this zero degree of the State that corresponds to the maximum degree of power, Žižek will seek it from international organizations, which would allow, in what seems to be his vision, the totalitarian exercise without a totalizing entity, a rigid ultrapower but diffuse, exercised in the name of “solidarity” and therefore unassailable - because who would dare to stand against solidarity?

“Solidarity” is yet another noble and dignified concept that the left intends to kidnap and pervert, corrupting inside, to serve its liberticidal purposes.

    They have done or tried to do the same with the concepts of justice, tolerance, human rights, with the very concept of freedom.
“It is not a utopian communist vision, it is communism imposed by the demands of pure survival. This is a variant of 'war communism' as the measures taken by the Soviet Union after 1918 were called ”.

Žižek seems to mean:

"Do not worry. There is nothing ideological about what I propose. I am only guided by the pragmatism of those who want to save humanity, and at this moment pragmatism dictates the option for a communist system, but it is an emergency communism, that's all. ”

Then we would ask:

“And when will this emergency end? When will this state of exception end? ”

Žižek would possibly reply, with a smile full of “solidarity”:

"The emergency will last forever."

Žižek is not concerned with the result of the quarantine for the containment of the coronavirus, he is not concerned with containing the coronavirus, but rather to favor the contagion of the other virus as much as possible, which he himself calls the ideological virus, “different and much more beneficial". He praises the quarantine precisely for its destructive potential. His dream world is Wuhan quarantined:

"... A ghost town, stores with the door open and no customers, only here and there a person on foot or a car, individuals in white masks (...) provides the image of a non-consumer world at peace with itself."

In Žižek's thought, at the cost of destroying the jobs that allow the dignified and minimally autonomous survival of millions and millions of people, at the price of dismantling their freedom and their livelihood, a world is reached “at peace with itself”.

Communism has always affirmed that its goal is the peace and emancipation of all humanity.

There, in a deserted city, without a job, without a life, where each one is a prisoner in his cubicle, under the supervision of a supreme authority that is not even the government of his own country (which, however dictatorial it is, still has at least one face and a flag), but an anonymous and unattainable global agency, that is the perfect configuration of communist peace and emancipation.

But the parallel with Nazism is perhaps an even more shocking passage from your book:

"’ Arbeit Macht Frei ’is still the correct motto, despite the terrible use that the Nazis made of it."

Žižek repeats here the motto placed on the doorstep of the Auschwitz concentration camp, the ultracinic, perverse statement that “Work liberates”.

According to him, therefore, the Nazis did not make a mistake in substance, they only made a mistake in their use of that phrase. important element of reflection.)

According to this exponent of Marxism, Arbeit macht frei is the “correct motto” of the new era of global solidarity that is coming as a result of the pandemic, and what differentiates this new world from the Auschwitz camp is that now this horrible lie will be put to good use which perverts and humiliates two sacred values ​​of humanity, work and freedom.
Os comunistas não repetirão o erro dos nazistas e desta vez farão o uso correto.
Como?
Talvez convencendo as pessoas de que é pelo seu próprio bem que elas estarão presas nesse campo de concentração, desprovidas de dignidade e liberdade.

Ocorre-me propor uma definição: o nazista é um comunista que não se deu ao trabalho de enganar as suas vítimas.
“Não é talvez o espírito humano também uma espécie de vírus, que age como parasita no animal humano, o utiliza para se reproduzir, e às vezes ameaça destruí-lo? E se é verdade que o meio do espírito é a linguagem, não seria oportuno considerar que, num plano mais elementar, a linguagem é também alguma coisa mecânica, uma simples questão de regras que devemos aprender e respeitar?”
Sempre sustentei que o controle da linguagem para destruí-la enquanto meio de pensamento, ou meio do espírito como bem diz Žižek, é um dos grandes objetivos do comunismo, para destruir a dimensão espiritual do homem e assim assujeitá-lo completamente.
Se o espírito vive na linguagem e se a linguagem não passa de regras a serem aprendida e respeitadas (sim, respeitadas!), isso significa que a linguagem está, como o comportamento social na quarentena, sujeita aos mecanismos de “vigiar e punir”.

Já era assim com as regras do politicamente correto. Agora o politicamente correto incorpora o sanitariamente correto, muitas vezes mais poderoso.

O sanitariamente correto te agarra, te algema e te ameaça:
“Se você disser isso ou aquilo, você coloca em risco toda a sociedade, se você pronunciar a palavra liberdade você é um subversivo que pode levar toda a sua população a morrer – então respeite as regras.” 

Controlar a linguagem para matar o espírito, eis a essência do comunismo atual, esse comunismo que de repente encontrou no coronavírus um tesouro de opressão.
Também já disse e repito: o verdadeiro inimigo que o comunismo quer abater não é o capitalismo, o inimigo do comunismo é o espírito humano, na sua complexidade e beleza.

É o espírito humano que o vírus ideológico de Žižek chegou para destruir.
Uma pergunta surge após a leitura desse programa totalitário cheio de desfaçatez e hipocrisia:

Deve-se levar Žižek a sério? Muito a sério.
Žižek é provavelmente o escritor marxista mais lido nos últimos trinta anos.
Influencia faculdades e círculos intelecutais “progressistas” ao redor do mundo, que por sua vez influenciam a mídia, que influencia os políticos, que tomam decisões muitas vezes inconscientes da raiz ideológica dos conceitos “pragmáticos” pelos quais se deixam guiar.

O que diferencia Žižek de muitos de seus pares é que ele enuncia abertamente o que outros escondem nas entrelinhas.
Em suma, Žižek explicita aquilo que vinha sendo preparado há trinta anos, desde a queda do muro de Berlim, quando o comunismo não desapareceu, mas apenas dotou-se de novos instrumentos: o globalismo é o novo caminho do comunismo.

O vírus aparece, de fato, como imensa oportunidade para acelerar o projeto globalista.

Este já se vinha executando por meio do climatismo ou alarmismo climático, da ideologia de gênero, do dogmatismo politicamente correto, do imigracionismo, do racialismo ou reorganização da sociedade pelo princípio da raça, do antinacionalismo, do cientificismo.

São instrumentos eficientes, mas a pandemia, colocando indivíduos e sociedades diante do pânico da morte iminente, representa a exponencialização de todos eles.

A pretexto da pandemia, o novo comunismo trata de construir um mundo sem nações, sem liberdade, sem espírito, dirigido por uma agência central de “solidariedade” encarregada de vigiar e punir.

Um estado de exceção global permanente, transformando o mundo num grande campo de concentração.

Diante disso, precisamos lutar pela saúde do corpo e pela saúde do espírito humano, contra o Coronavírus mas também contra o Comunavírus, que tenta aproveitar a oportunidade destrutiva aberta pelo primeiro, um parasita do parasita.

---

(*) Žižek, Slavoj. Virus. Milão, Ponte Alle Grazie, 2020 (Quinta edição digital.) (A tradução do italiano ao português de todos os textos citados é minha.)
(**) Agamben, Giorgio. “Lo stato d’eccezione provocato da un’emergenza immotivata”. Il Manifesto – Quotidiano Comunista, 26/02/2020.

Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history

Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history

PLANDEMIC Censored and Removed! WHY?

Officials to Take People Out of Their Homes

Jean-Dominique Michel | "Anatomie d'un désastre" | Avril 2020

OMS FAZ RECOMENDAÇÃO SINISTRA

Professeur Luc Montagnier : Le virus covid19 est une manipulation humaine

Hoofbeats of the Four Horsemen?  By Jan Markell

Published on: April 16, 2020 by RRadmin7 Category:General Articles, Jan Markell
 

According to Lifeway Research , many pastors are apparently having an “aha” moment due to the tide of our times. It’s about time. I am now hope-filled. They are seeing current events today as things the Bible forecast for the end-of-days.  But I maintain their pulpits could still be silent.

Let’s be optimistic. When real church resumes, the pulpits will boldly announce that we are in the last days and Jesus is coming soon. Get your houses in order!

Darrell Bock, New Testament professor at Dallas Seminary , noted that the Bible has several lists of potential signs of Jesus’ return, such as the Olivet Discourse passages, and some include concepts of global sickness. These are Tribulation references.

“Numerous biblical texts speak of disturbances in the creation that disorient and trouble people,” said Bock. “These disturbances have quite a range with earthquakes and wars being the most common. Jesus mentions plagues or pestilence explicitly in Luke 21.”

Three out of four pastors in the survey have noted that world and church events have meaning today. They include the rise in apostasy, the love of believers growing cold, the decline in traditional morals, national conflicts, natural disasters, famines, and even the rise in anti-Semitism. Even if they are Tribulation events, they are casting a shadow on the Church Age.

So is a new day in the church approaching thanks to some kind of a wake-up call? Almost 25 years ago, the church-growth movement said teaching any kind of eschatology would not grow the church.

Pastors were encouraged to keep quiet about the soon return of the Lord. Pastor Rick Warren even said in his Purpose Driven Life book that teaching Bible prophecy would distract you from your purpose and make you unfit for the Kingdom of God. Pastors listened to him!

In the information produced by Lifeway Research , Joel Rosenberg states, “For too long, many pastors have shied away from teaching on birth pangs and events leading up to the Second Coming of the Lord, but the current pandemic demonstrates the need for solid, non-sensational preaching done in a biblical manner.”

The Lifeway report reveals that more than half the pastors expect Jesus to return in their lifetime.  So why on earth are their pulpits not proclaiming this?

But there is more to the survey! Almost 70% of those surveyed believe the modern re-birth of Israel and the re-gathering of millions of Jewish people were fulfillments of prophecies in the Bible. 

That’s great news but that was 72 years ago. Why haven’t you been preaching that, pastors? More than that, 40% of the pastors surveyed believe that the establishment of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem two years ago was a sign of the last days!

This is great sermon material! It could get a church fired up! But most pulpits I hear about are silent on the topic.
 

The most frequent e-mail Olive Tree Ministries receives has to do with this topic: Where can I find a prophecy-preaching, relevant issues-focused church? Where can I find a church that is warning of things to come instead of emphasizing your best life now?  

Brent Miller, Jr. of Ingenuity Films made the new Rapture-themed film production, Before the Wrath , because his research, which also tapped into Lifeway , revealed that 98% of the church will not teach on anything end-time related. Both eschatology and Israel are marginalized. You read that right: 98%.

Let’s add one more equation into our discussion and that is what should be obvious to every observer. The book of Revelation tells us there is coming a one-world system run by the Antichrist. That new world order requires a crisis—a global crisis, not a local crisis. We have it—a global pandemic.  Isn’t this more fuel for a discussion?

The world is in meltdown mode right now and people are asking a lot of questions. We don’t even know if life as we once knew it will ever happen again. It may not!

Pastors, are you talking about this?

The Church is to be removed before the revealing of the lawless one, the Antichrist. I maintain he is just over the horizon, raring to go. And the four horsemen of the apocalypse may be training on some race track somewhere! You can almost hear their hoofbeats.

Pastors, don’t be silent! Maybe this is truly a new day for you. Seize the opportunity. Please see that all things are falling into place. Be excited. Be truthful. Don’t marginalize such important news. Connect the dots for your people.

Jesus is returning any moment. Please stop the silence of the pulpits.

Share this:

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)

COVID-19 Is A Man-Made Virus: HIV-Discoverer Says "Could Only Have Been Created In A Lab"

by Tyler Durden

Fri, 04/17/2020 - 08:45

As the mainstream media and politicians begin to raise/admit the possibilities that the source of COVID-19 was likely a lab in Wuhan (accidentally leaked or otherwise) - something we first brought to the world's attention in January before being mocked, censored, and chastised - it appears more actual 'scientists' (at least those not paid by or working for a lab in Wuhan) are willing to admit what we noted all along - this virus is man-made.



GilmoreHealth.com's Robert Miller writes that contrary to the narrative that is being pushed by the mainstream that the COVID 19 virus was the result of a natural mutation and that it was transmitted to humans from bats via pangolins, Dr Luc Montagnier the man who discovered the HIV virus back in 1983 disagrees and is saying that the virus was man made.


Professor Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Prize winner for Medicine, claims that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. Chinese researchers are said to have used coronaviruses in their work to develop an AIDS vaccine. HIV DNA fragments are believed to have been found in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.

We knew that the Chinese version of how the coronavirus emerged was increasingly under attack, but here’s a thesis that tells a completely different story about the Covid-19 pandemic, which is already responsible for more than 110,000 deaths worldwide.

According to Professor Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008 for “discovering” HIV as the cause of the AIDS epidemic together with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, the SARS-CoV-2 is a virus that was manipulated and accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, in the last quarter of 2019. 

According to Professor Montagnier, this laboratory, known for its work on coronaviruses, tried to use one of these viruses as a vector for HIV in the search for an AIDS vaccine!
“With my colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,” explains Luc Montagnier, interviewed by Dr Jean-François Lemoine for the daily podcast at Pourquoi Docteur, adding that others have already explored this avenue:

Indian researchers have already tried to publish the results of the analyses that showed that this coronavirus genome contained sequences of another virus, … the HIV virus (AIDS virus), but they were forced to withdraw their findings as the pressure from the mainstream was too great.

In a challenging question Dr Jean-François Lemoine inferred that the coronavirus under investigation may have come from a patient who is otherwise infected with HIV.

"No," says Luc Montagnier, "in order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory."

According to the 2008 Nobel Prize for Medicine, a plausible explanation would be an accident in the Wuhan laboratory. He also added that the purpose of this work was the search for an AIDS vaccine.

The truth will eventually come out

In any case, this thesis, defended by Professor Luc Montagnier, has a positive turn. According to him, the altered elements of this virus are eliminated as it spreads:

“Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes and even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths.”

Luc Montagnier added that with the help of interfering waves, we could eliminate these sequences and as a result stop the pandemic.
This is enough to feed some heated debates! So much so that Professor Montagnier’s statements could also place him in the category of “conspiracy theorists”:

“Conspirators are the opposite camp, hiding the truth,” he replies, without wanting to accuse anyone, but hoping that the Chinese will admit to what he believes happened in their laboratory.

To entice a confession from the Chinese he used the example of Iran which after taking full responsibility for accidentally hitting a Ukrainian plane was able to earn the respect of the global community. Hopefully the Chinese will do the right thing he adds.

“In any case, the truth always comes out, it is up to the Chinese government to take responsibility.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/health/covid-19-man-made-virus-hiv-discoverer-says-could-only-have-been-created-lab?fbclid=IwAR0oK14Mc89HYp2hJjoDUjx9J1TsYksCWTvsd9tmjTUrx0A-vmuMSo1D-FU

*~ALERT~*SOURCE OF US OUTBREAK EVENT NOW IDENTIFIED(!)UNDENIABLE *PROOF ...

COVID Clinical Discussion w/Cameron Kyle-Sidell: NYC ED/ICU doc in the trenches. #FOAMed

Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell is an ED-ICU Doc at Maimonides in New York, currently under the COVID fire. He put up an inflammatory tweet yesterday which caused a lot of different reactions, because it clearly challenged the widespread even if only recent belief that one should intubate the COVID patients quite early, usually much earlier than one would in typical respiratory failure:

So here you go:
Audio Player

 

Please share your thoughts and experiences – my comments in bold!

Korbin Haycock:
Very interesting. My experience is zero cases so far with COVID-19. Just some thoughts for what it’s worth from someone with no experience with COVID: Hypoxia is due to V/Q mismatch, diffusion, hypoventilation, low pO2 (altitude), shunt, low cardiac output (as more O2 is extracted off HgB and mixed venous O2 is low), and finally hemoglobin problems (whether by poisoning or defective HgB).

It was pointed out to me by Brett Berliner tonight in a paper (via twitter) that SARS CoV-2 appears to disrupt the beta chain of HgB to take up O2. I’d never heard of this, but if this is the case, exchange transfusion makes sense as a therapy for hypoxia as long as one is past the stage of illness where the viral levels are low. If this is a hemoglobinopathy, no amount of increase in mean airway pressure or FiO2 will fix the hypoxia.

Perhaps people out there with actual experience with COVID-19 can shed additional light on how the hypoxia tends to respond to positive pressure or increases in FiO2, or more importantly a lack of expected response, that would indicate the mechanism of hypoxia (such as a hemoglobinopathy).

It is very interesting that the hypoxic patients described in the post don’t appear to be very symptomatic in terms of SOB, nor do they attempt to compensate for the ding to DO2 from low O2 sats (O2 content) with an increase in HR to drive up CO. Normally DO2/VO2 ratios are around 4-5, so either the illness suppresses the normal physiological response to a decrease in the ratio, or the VO2 is suppressed somehow (seems unlikely). In any event, perhaps we should revisit the idea to intubate early if hypoxic, unless the patient actually looks really bad.

Summer Allen:
I’m Pulm/cc. This was fascinating and sparked some ideas. But, I need someone smarter than me to take it forward. The first thought is this is not what we know. It’s a different beast. Stop trying to make it fit what we know.

Why are people not short of breath or tachycardic? I suspect most of this is that compliance is high and there is no issue with expiratory flow limitation, hence WOB is more or less normal… And once hypoxia is corrected with O2, they feel fine.
Does the virus hide hypoxia from the body? Maybe it turns off normal feedback that would make us short of breath and tachycardic. The body doesn’t compensate because it doesn’t know it’s hypoxic. That’s why people are being found dead at home because they didn’t know they were slowly suffocating. Maybe it’s not affecting kids because their feedback mechanisms are more heightened already because of growth. Trying to think outside of the box after listening to this. I definitely agree that treating these patients like normal pneumonia with vent/pressors/fluids isn’t the answer.

Bala Totapally
Looks like these pts have severe V/Q mismatch without abnormalities in respiratory mechanics. Almost like a cyanotic heart condition. I agree if the mechanics are not worsening we may not achieve a lot by early intubation except to prevent sudden deterioration, if anything. HFNC with 100% will be the right choice. Has anyone tried nitric oxide before intubation? Might work to improve V/Q mismatch and reduce RV strain.
I am definitely planning to look at RV function and use inhaled vasodilators both for the VQ and for RV function. 

Richard Harper:
Great talk and very fascinating points. Short of hyperbaric chambers for everyone, I think keeping everyone on high flow for as long as possible seems very reasonable. Given the ongoing reports I’m seeing regarding the pathophysiology regarding COVID-19 related lung disease, including your shared observations, it seems like using stress index on intubated patients would be the best measure of appropriate PEEP in this setting without “trashing” the lungs. If our understanding is correct regarding the atelectatic, high compliance Sars-cov-2 lung is correct, then the PEEP table is not going to accurately predict the proper settings and the stress index measured once a day would solve the problem of too much PEEP.

stay safe!

Philippe

FROM NYC DOC: SHOULD COVID-19 VENTILATOR PROTOCALS BE CHANGED!!!

FROM NYC ICU: DOES COVID-19 REALLY CAUSE ARDS??!!

Coronavírus: Como manter fortes os quatro pilares da imunidade

Essa Crise Mundial foi Planejada? - Dr. Walter Veith

Walter Veith & Martin Smith - Coronavirus, Noahide Laws, End Time - What...