Iran, in an unusual arrangement, will be allowed to use its own experts to inspect a site it allegedly used to develop nuclear arms under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work
The revelation is sure to roil American
and Israeli critics of the main Iran deal signed by the U.S., Iran and
five world powers in July. Those critics have complained that the deal is built on trust of the Iranians, a claim the U.S. has denied.
The investigation of the Parchin nuclear site by the International Atomic Energy Agency
is linked to a broader probe of allegations that Iran has worked on
atomic weapons. That investigation is part of the overarching nuclear
deal.
The Parchin deal is a separate, side agreement
worked out between the IAEA and Iran. The United States and the five
other world powers that signed the Iran nuclear deal were not party to
this agreement but were briefed on it by the IAEA and endorsed it as
part of the larger package.
Without divulging its contents, the Obama
administration has described the document as nothing more than a routine
technical arrangement between Iran and the U.N.’s International Atomic
Energy Agency on the particulars of inspecting the site.
Any IAEA member country must give the agency some
insight into its nuclear program. Some countries are required to do no
more than give a yearly accounting of the nuclear material they possess.
But nations- like Iran – suspected of possible proliferation are under
greater scrutiny that can include stringent inspections.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s full anti-Iran deal speech
But the agreement diverges from normal inspection
procedures between the IAEA and a member country by essentially ceding
the agency’s investigative authority to Iran. It allows Tehran to employ
its own experts and equipment in the search for evidence for activities
that it has consistently denied – trying to develop nuclear weapons.
Evidence of that concession, as outlined in the document, is sure to increase pressure from U.S. congressional opponents as they review the July 14 Iran nuclear deal and vote on a resolution of disapproval in early September. If the resolution passed and President Barack Obama vetoed it, opponents would need a two-thirds majority to override it. Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, has suggested opponents will likely lose.
The White House has denied claims by critics that a
secret “side deal” favorable to Tehran exists. U.S. Secretary of State
John Kerry has said the Parchin document is like other routine
arrangements between the agency and individual IAEA member nations,
while IAEA chief Yukiya Amano told Republican senators last week that he
is obligated to keep the document confidential. source
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment is appreciated and helps me in choosing various subjects for my posts. Thank you. Ce blogger apprécie vos commentaires qui l´aident à choisir de nouveaux thèmes.. Seus comentarios são bemvindos e ajudam este blogger na escolha de uma variedade de temas.