Reblogged from - www.omegaletter.com
In
1939 the world was holding its collective breath in anticipation of
what was shaping up to be another world war. "World war" means something
different North Americans than it does to the rest of the world.
For
North Americans, "world war" meant, at worst, conscription, rationing
and blackouts. For everybody else, it meant air raids, occupation
forces, destroyed cities, refugee camps, reprisals and death on
wholesale levels, up close and personal.
But
even from the perspective of North America, the prospect of another
world war must have seemed like end-of-the-world stuff. The US was still
suffering from a decade-long Depression - without the benefit of social
programs, welfare, food stamps, Medicare, Medicaid etc.
The
veterans of the last war were in their late thirties to early fifties.
Having witnessed the horrors of the European battlefields last time
around when weaponry was relatively primitive, the horrors to come must
have looked very much like what we might anticipate the Tribulation to
look like.
By
1939 the Nazi persecution of the Jews was well-known; the infamous
Kristallnacht (Night of the Broken Glass) had occurred the year before.
Those Jews that managed to escape to the West shared what they witnessed
first-hand.
In Germany, schoolchildren said grace before meals to their Fuhrer and asked his blessing on them before bedtime.
"Fuehrer,
my fuehrer, bequeathed to me by the Lord protect and preserve me as
long as I live..." -Excerpt from a prayer children said to Hitler in his
public schools
The
Fuhrer governed over a system symbolized by the swastika - a broken
cross -- that gave special economic status to Party members who swore an
oath of allegiance to the Fuhrer.
Under
that system, persons could be excluded from normal social and financial
intercourse for not following Party rules, refusing to join the Party,
speaking out against the Fuhrer, or simply for being Jews.
In
1939, the whole world was teetering on the brink - the League of
Nations, designed to prevent a repeat of the Great War, ended up helping
to shape the alliances of the one looming on the horizon.
Hitler's
vision was of a revival of "New Order" for a "Thousand Year Reich"
modeled after the old Roman Empire. He partnered with Benito Mussolini,
dictator of Rome.
A
concordat is an agreement between the Pope and a sovereign state on
matters relating to the Roman Catholic Church - in essence, a limited
partnership between the Church and state. It was signed in 1933 by Nazi
Vice Chancellor Fritz Von Papen and Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli on behalf
of Pope Pius XI.
In
1939, Eugenio Pacelli was elevated to become Pope Pius XII. So by 1939
the Vatican, political Rome and Nazi Germany were all bound by one form
of treaty alliance or another. The Soviets had just inked the
Molotov-von Ribbentrop Pact in August, 1939.
So here is the Big Picture in summary as it appeared at the time:
In
1939, it certainly looked as if Hitler's hegemony would encompass the
whole world. His empire was modeled after that of Rome and at its
height, encompassed all its territory.
Hitler
was partnered with Rome -- and with the Vatican based on a treaty with
the sitting Pope and had just concluded a non-aggression pact with
Gog-Magog and had embarked on a systematic extermination of the Jews.
Some
Jews had begun returning to their homeland in Palestine since 1917 in
fulfillment of Ezekiel's vision of the valley of dry bones.
From
the perspective of Bible prophecy as it would have appeared in 1939,
Hitler was a good fit for the antichrist and Mussolini/Pius XII -- a
sort of hybrid political/religious beast. Jews and Bible Christians were
being rounded up and put into camps.
There
was again a Jewish presence in Israel, albeit under foreign occupation
(as it was in AD 70) a Gog Magog connection, a European dictator with a
god complex, heavily into the occult and clearly demonically empowered,
the specific involvement of Rome . . .
In
1939, one could easily have made the case that either the Tribulation
was about to start -- or we are already in the Tribulation now.
How is it any different today?
Assessment:
I
could fill a week's worth of column space just listing all the
historical similarities between the present state of world affairs and
conditions as they existing in 1939.
Does
that mean that we could be as far off the mark as somebody in 1939
would be in seeing Hitler as the antichrist and WWII as the Tribulation?
That is what a lot of scoffers like to argue.
"Where
is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all
things continue as they have from the beginning of Creation."
In other words, "We've heard all this before . . what about Hitler and Mussolini? What is different this time?"
It's
a fair question. I've made a pretty convincing case for Hitler by
making Bible prophecy fit current events (as they were then) -- but
notice that I didn't need to twist either one in the process.
That's
what makes understanding the framework of Bible prophecy so important.
Outside the framework of Dispensationalist systematic theology, close
counts.
When close counts, it becomes possible to reinterpret Bible prophecy until it fits current events.
But
working within the Dispensationalist framework, there at least seven
reasons why Hitler could not have been the antichrist and World War II
could NOT have been the Tribulation.
1. Global
Annihilation Wasn't Yet Possible: In Matthew 24:22, Jesus says that
"unless that time (the Tribulation) be cut short, there should be no
flesh saved." Even though we had split the atom by late 1945, the
technology necessary to annihilate all flesh was still twenty years
away.
2. There
was no Israel: The Bible confidently predicts the existence of a
recognized state of Israel, known as "Israel" which is reclaimed from
the desert by Jews drawn from the four corners of the earth. In 1939,
some Jews lived under British rule in the Palestinian Mandate.
3. The
Bible predicts the revival of Rome by peaceful means: Daniel says of
the antichrist that he will "by peace shall destroy many" Hitler's
unification of Europe by force did not qualify.
4. World-wide
instant communication was not possible. The Bible says that when Jesus
returns, every eye shall see Him. When the two witnesses lay dead in the
streets of Jerusalem, their images will be broadcast world-wide. When
they are restored to life three and a half days later, the whole world
will witness that event, as well.
5. The
Gospel was not yet preached into all the world. In 1939 there remained
many places so isolated that they had never heard of civilization, let
alone Jesus. The Gospel still has not been preached in all the world -
there remain dozens of indigenous tribes world-wide that have yet to
make contact with the outside world.
6. There
was no Covenant: The Prophet Daniel predicts the antichrist will
confirm a seven year peace 'covenant' between Israel and 'the many.' In
order to confirm an agreement, first there must be an agreement to
confirm. In 1939 there was no covenant and as noted, there was no
Israel.
In
September, 1993, Israel signed the Oslo Agreement with the
Palestinians. It outlined a land-for-peace process that was supposed to
culminate with an agreement on the final status of Jerusalem by
September, 2000, exactly seven years later. Instead, Yasser Arafat
abrogated the deal and in September, 2000 he called for a new intifada,
quickly dubbed by Israel as "The Oslo War."
7. There
was no expectation of Christ's Coming: The Bible says that when the
events prophesied for the last generation begin to come to pass, that
generation will recognize that their redemption draws near. There was no
sense of messianic expectation in 1939. In 2011, the discussion
transcends all barriers; Christians are looking for the Rapture, Muslims
are looking for the Mahdi, the Messianic movement in Israel has never
been stronger. Even movies and popular music reflect the expectation
that the end is near.
There
is a reason why I study Bible prophecy within the framework of
Dispensationalism and it is the reason that I teach it as the only
logical way to rightly divide the Word of Truth.
Dispensationalism
demands literal interpretation unless the text clearly indicates
otherwise. It demands that Bible prophecy follow the Bible's systematic
outline, dividing history according to Dispensation, rather than
according to current events. Paul wrote to his disciple, Timothy;
"Study
to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be
ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of truth." (2 Timothy 2:15)
Obviously,
if Paul admonished Timothy to rightly divide the Word of Truth, it also
reveals two axiomatic truths. First it is possible to divide it
wrongly. And secondly, it confirms the Word is "divided" to begin with.
If
it is divided, and if it is possible to get the divisions wrong, then
it would seem that there IS a right way. And if there is a right way,
then there can only be ONE right way.
Do you really think there can be several right ways? For anything?
One
doesn't need to adopt Dispensationalism to be saved. One needn't be a
Dispensationalist to be a Christian or to study the Word of God.
But
if one wants to have a grasp of unfolding Bible prophecy and where
Bible prophecy shapes current events, rather than the other way around,
then there must be a discernible, logical flow.
The
Bible divides it by dispensation. Without that division, Bible prophecy
becomes little more than a confusing jumble of heads, horns and beasts.
And when it comes to figuring out what it all might mean, your guess is as good as mine.
Note:
We received an email the other day directing us to "new insights" in
Bible Prophecy. Being skeptical we forwarded it onto the prophecy
experts we have within Omega Letter. They confirmed what Jack would say,
"Things that are different are not the same". And as our Lord says in
Ecclesiastes 1:9;
"The
thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done
is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment is appreciated and helps me in choosing various subjects for my posts. Thank you. Ce blogger apprécie vos commentaires qui l´aident à choisir de nouveaux thèmes.. Seus comentarios são bemvindos e ajudam este blogger na escolha de uma variedade de temas.